CARBON CREDIT CENTER

RESEARCH & INTELLIGENCE

Evidence first.
Perspective second.

A curated reading room with official sources, dates and practical questions. Research checked 13 November 2026.

01 / INTEGRITY

Quality at the unit level. Credibility at the claim level.

ICVCM sets out principles for credit integrity; VCMI addresses corporate use and claims. Our interpretation: keep a project-evidence file and a separate record of the rationale for any public statement.

These resources serve different functions. Neither replaces a project-specific or jurisdiction-specific review.

ICVCM · Core Carbon Principles →Undated; checked 13 November 2026VCMI · Claims Code of Practice →Living resource; checked 13 November 2026
02 / MARKET STRUCTURE

Start by asking what the credit is for.

ICAO publishes the official resources for CORSIA. Voluntary climate contributions and aviation obligations should not be treated as a single purchasing category. Check the applicable scheme documents for any intended compliance use.

No individual project or unit is represented here as compliance-eligible.

ICAO · CORSIA →Living resource; checked 13 November 2026
03 / PROCUREMENT

A specification is more useful than an average price.

Abatable’s October 2026 Buyer signals report examines procurement and retirement patterns. Our interpretation: specifying activity, vintage, volume and delivery needs can make competing offers easier to compare.

Provider-authored research reflects its stated dataset and methodology. It is not a census of the entire carbon market.

Abatable · Buyer signals →15 October 2026

EDITORIAL METHOD

Useful context. Clear boundaries.

Primary sources

We link to official organisations and original company publications.

Dated research

Dates distinguish publication from our review. Undated pages are identified.

Visible limitations

No live prices, market forecasts or unsupported market-size figures are presented.